
Swing Physics
Driver Launch
Programs
Gear Effect
Early MOI
Recent MOI
Forecast
Forecasting
Ball Flight
FlexFace Irons
SquareGroove
Hardness
One Length
3D Launch
Phases
Centripetal
|
Golf ClubsGolf Swing Physics Here is a wonderful article, guest-authored by Rod White, a physicist with
the New Zealand Measurements Standards Laboratory. It starts from basic
Newtonian physics (like we learned in the tutorial) and shows how a
good golf swing works. With animations, videos, graphs, and [completely
optional] equations, the article covers both swing technique and club
technology and how they combine for power drives.
Optimizing a Driver's Launch Parameters Note:
the computer output on which this program is based has been called into
question. See the next article for more detail about the questions.
A
lot of clubfitters use launch monitors now to fit the driver to the
golfer. A common scenario is to get to a fast maximum, but one that
doesn't match the spin and launch angle numbers that are supposed to be
optimum. This is followed by tinkering to get to the optimum launch
conditions -- usually with little or no additional distance to show for
it.
Here is why that happens, and what to do about
it.
Comparison of Trajectory Programs This mini-study was provoked by response to my study of launch space
surfaces, and my driver fitting recommendations based on that study.
The accuracy of the Tom Wishon Trajectory Profiler was called into
question. Here I compare the Wishon program to three others, and to
measured, real-world data.
All About Gear Effect Gear effect occurs when a driver strikes the ball, and the impact misses the
sweet spot. The result is a rotation of the clubhead that imparts spin
to the ball. It answers all kinds of questions, like: why woods are
designed with curved faces... why weight screws may (or may not)
give a hook bias... why a driver gives maximum distance when hit
above center on the clubface. I was surprised by a few of the answers
myself.
Early Experience with MOI Matching
In the first half of 1995, I was experimenting with MOI matched clubs.
This was based on math and physics I did in 1994 suggesting this would
be a better way to match clubs than swingweight. I posted my
experiences to rec.sport.golf, the golfing
interest newsgroup on the Internet. Here is an anthology of those
postings.
More Recent MOI-Matching Experience It took thirteen years and several tries, but I think I now know what sort
of MOI-matched clubs I need. Here is the what and why of a set that
fits me better than my earlier attempts at playing MOI-matched irons.
Golf Technology Forecast - 2008 In 2008, motivated by a forecast made by Tom Wishon at the fifth World
Scientific
Congress of Golf, I prepared a five-year technology forecast. I decided
to use as a ground rule Tom's conclusion that much of the progress would be in the area
of custom club fitting. Here is my cut at it.
Technology Forecasting This article is a companion to a technology forecast I made in 2008. Technology forecasting itself is a
"vocational skill", which involves being able to apply some
well-understood principles. Here are some of the ways a professional forecaster looks
at things.
The Nine Ball Flights There is a common diagram in many golf books that purports to show the
nine basic ball flights. Unfortunately, that diagram is somewhere
between useless and incorrect. Here is a version (actually two
versions) of the diagram that correspond to physical reality.
Flex-face Irons Can Be More Forgiving than Rigid-face Irons Unlike drivers, irons are not about maximum distance, but rather reliable,
predictable distance. I felt that high-COR irons worked against this
principle because the COR falls off away from the center, adding to the
losses from an off-center impact. Tom Wishon proved me wrong. Here's
the real story.
The Great Square Groove Controversy
In the late 1980s and early '90s, it was widely -- and incorrectly --
believed that square grooves were illegal. Here's how that rumor came
about, and what really
happened.
Hardness and Distance, or A Myth is Not As Good As A Mile
This was inspired by a debate about whether a super-hard clubface
material will give more distance. It was first written before
spring-face drivers and coefficient of restitution was an issue, but it
gives some hints that a hard face is not the way to get more distance;
a face that flexes is.
Constant-Length Irons Bill
Wade asked my opinion of constant-length iron sets. I realized my study
on this is more than ten years old now, and needs to be revisited.
Here's my new take on the issue.
3-Dimensional
Launch Conditions from Impact Conditions
Going
from impact conditions to launch conditions is a challenge.
It's even harder in 3D. Here's my cut at how to do it. (Math
warning! Most of this article consists of deriving equations for launch
conditions, and is heavy with trigonometry.)
Phases for Physical Analysis Applying
scientific analysis to golf has as its ultimate purpose calculating how
the inputs
(things like club characteristics and the parameters of the golfer's
swing) map to where the ball eventually ends up. This analysis can't be
done in one big equation; that would be way too complicated. But,
fortunately, the analysis can be decomposed into "phases" where the
outputs of one phase become inputs for the next. Here are some musings
on this decomposition.
Centripetal Matching In July of 2005, a discussion started on the FGI forum about matching
sets of golf clubs based on the centripetal force trying to pull the
clubs out of the golfers' hands. They had the analysis and measurement
all wrong, so I
wrote this article on how it really works -- and found out that it
really doesn't. I don't think this will ever be a classic, but it's a
good study in how to see whether a proposal for improving golf club
design has any merit.
Copyright Dave Tutelman
2010 -- All rights reserved
|
|